One of the nation’s largest banks discriminates against black, Latino and Asian homebuyers by offering lesser qualified white borrowers higher loan amounts and using hidden racial criteria in one of its loan programs, according to a lawsuit filed this week in federal court in Manhattan. The suit also accuses the bank of steering homebuyers to certain neighborhoods based on their race or ethnicity.Full Story»
Columnist Gael O’Brien examines an embarrassing customer misstep by financial software giant Intuit and suggests that corporate leaders should more closely question the “why” of major business decisions. “It is a powerful deterrent to mistakes,” she says, “and a key asset in keeping trust.”
This week, the U.S. Supreme Court will take up one of the most important civil rights cases of the last decade when it considers the case of Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. The Inclusive Communities Project. The case concerns whether the Fair Housing Act, which sought to end the longstanding segregation of America’s neighborhoods, should be read to only bar intentional discrimination. For four decades, federal courts have held that the law should be interpreted more broadly.
An investigation by ProPublica examines information from a database known as Open Payments, which gives the first comprehensive look at how much money drug and device companies have spent working with doctors. What it shows is that the drugs most aggressively promoted to doctors typically aren’t cures or even big medical breakthroughs. Some are top sellers, but most are not.
More in this category
- Why Thanksgiving Day Store Openings Are Bad Business
- Secret Tapes Hint at Turmoil in New York Fed Team Monitoring JPMorgan
- Internal Survey Shows the Red Cross’ Own Employees Doubt the Charity’s Ethics
- The Role of ‘Spiritual Intelligence’ in 21st Century Leadership
- Plagiarism: Why Some Smart People Do Some Very Stupid Things
- The Ethics of Intrusion