A 2015 working paper from Harvard Law School, “Corporate Speech and the First Amendment: History, Data and Implications,” indicates that Citizens United, while certainly important, is only the latest in a series of cases that have expanded corporate use of the First Amendment. In his research, the author, John C. Coates IV, performed an analysis of nearly 13,000 Supreme Court decisions from 1946 to December 2014.Full Story»
A special examiner hired – and fired – by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York recorded about 46 hours of meetings and conversations with her colleagues. Many of these events document key moments leading to her firing. But they also offer an intimate study of the New York Fed’s culture at a pivotal moment in its effort to become a more forceful financial supervisor.
In January, Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas, ascended to the powerful chairmanship of the House Financial Services Committee. Six weeks later, campaign finance filings and interviews show, Hensarling was joined by representatives of the banking industry for a ski vacation fundraiser at a posh Park City, Utah, resort.
The continuing debate in Washington, D.C. over corporate campaign disclosure will pit the major political parties against a number of groups advocating greater disclosure. But a more far-reaching — and far less predictable — debate will occur between corporate executives and some of their large investors.
More in this category
- Is It Worth It? Political Spending and Corporate Governance
- Flood of Secret Campaign Cash: It’s Not All Citizens United
- How Microsoft and Yahoo Are Selling Politicians Access to You
- Meet the Media Companies Lobbying Against Transparency
- Opinion: A Punishment BP Can’t Pay Off
- A Growing Consensus on What to Do About Citizens United