<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Business Ethics &#187; Toshiba</title>
	<atom:link href="http://business-ethics.com/tag/toshiba/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://business-ethics.com</link>
	<description>The Magazine of Corporate Responsibility</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:38:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>How to Find Information on Green Electronics</title>
		<link>http://business-ethics.com/2010/11/27/5784-how-to-find-information-on-green-electronics/</link>
		<comments>http://business-ethics.com/2010/11/27/5784-how-to-find-information-on-green-electronics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 00:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin2</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EarthTalk - Consumer Info]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenpeace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lenovo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nintendo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nokia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Ericsson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toshiba]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://business-ethics.com/?p=5784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that many consumers are beginning to care about their own environmental footprints, manufacturers of electronic equipment are responding with loads of greener offerings. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>EarthTalk®<br />
From the Editors of E/The Environmental Magazine</strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Dear EarthTalk</span></strong><strong>: </strong><strong>Where can I find information on which electronics and their manufacturers are greener than others, with regard to components, manufacturing processes and end use efficiency?</strong><em> -- John Franken, New York, NY</em></p>
<div id="attachment_5785" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://business-ethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/EarthTalkGreenerElectronics.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-5785 " title="EarthTalkGreenerElectronics" src="http://business-ethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/EarthTalkGreenerElectronics-150x150.jpg" alt="EarthTalkGreenerElectronics" width="150" height="165" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Nokia got top honors from the Greenpeace Guide to Greener Electronics for the second year in a row. Pictured: The Nokia N97.</p></div>
<p>Now that many consumers are beginning to care about their own environmental footprints, manufacturers are responding with loads of greener offerings. One good place to find them is the <a href="http://www.greenpeace.org/international/campaigns/toxics/electronics/how-the-companies-line-up/" target="_blank"><strong>Greenpeace Guide to Greener Electronics</strong></a>, which ranks the 18 top manufacturers of personal computers, mobile phones, televisions and game consoles according to their policies on toxic chemicals, recycling and climate change. Greenpeace hopes that by publishing and regularly updating the guide they can both educate consumers about their choices and influence manufacturers to eliminate hazardous substances, take back and recycle their products responsibly, and reduce the climate impacts of their operations and products.</p>
<p>According to Greenpeace, the top five electronics manufacturers from a green perspective are Nokia, Sony Ericsson, Philips, HP and Samsung. These companies get high marks with Greenpeace for eliminating or scaling way back on the use of hazardous chemicals linked to cancer and other health and environmental problems, which in turn makes recycling their products less problematic.</p>
<p>Nokia gets top honors from Greenpeace for the second year in a row: All of the company’s new phone models and accessories for 2010 are free of brominated compounds, chlorinated flame retardants and antimony trioxide, three of the most toxic chemicals used commonly in most mobile phones and other consumer electronics today. Toshiba, Microsoft and Nintendo are the last place finishers on Greenpeace’s list for various reasons, including backtracking on or failing to make commitments to phase out chemicals used in the production of vinyl plastic (PVC) and brominated flame retardants (BFRs).</p>
<p>Another good place to find info on green electronics and related products is the new website of <a href="www.toptenusa.org" target="_blank"><strong>TopTen USA</strong></a>, a non-profit that identifies and publicizes the most energy-efficient products on the market. The goal of the group—which is part of a global alliance of like-minded non-profits—is to make it easier for consumers to find the most energy- and money-saving models, which in turn encourages manufacturing innovations that will shift the whole market in a greener direction. Besides listing the greenest individual models of desktop computers, laptops, monitors and televisions TopTen USA also lists the greenest refrigerators, freezers, dishwashers, clothes washers and even vehicles.</p>
<p>The non-profit Green Electronics Council, initially set up to help government, institutional and corporate purchasers evaluate, compare and select electronic products based on various environmental attributes, has now opened up its <a href="www.epeat.net" target="_blank"><strong>EPEAT green certification database</strong></a> to consumers. Some 1,300 computers, thin clients, workstations and monitors from dozens of manufacturers now bear the EPEAT certification label ensuring compliance with green manufacturing and recycling standards. All federal purchasers are required to choose between EPEAT-certified models when possible, and the database has steadily gained traction across a wide range of industries. Now consumers can freely browse the listings to see how various items from the likes of Apple, LG, Panasonic, Lenovo and Sony, among others, stack up.</p>
<p><strong>Photo </strong>by William Hook, courtesy Flickr</p>
<p><strong>SEND YOUR ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONS TO:</strong> <strong>EarthTalk®</strong>, c/o <strong>E – The Environmental Magazine</strong>,<strong> </strong>P.O.<strong> </strong>Box 5098, Westport, CT 06881; earthtalk@emagazine.com. <strong>E </strong>is a nonprofit publication. <strong>Subscribe</strong>: <a href="http://www.emagazine.com/subscribe">www.emagazine.com/subscribe</a>; <strong>Request a Free Trial Issue</strong>: <a href="http://www.emagazine.com/trial">www.emagazine.com/trial</a>.</p>
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=How+to+Find+Information+on+Green+Electronics+http://business-ethics.com/?p=5784" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://business-ethics.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter-big4.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://business-ethics.com/2010/11/27/5784-how-to-find-information-on-green-electronics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senator Questions 30 Companies on Human Rights in China</title>
		<link>http://business-ethics.com/2010/02/03/1334-senator-asks-30-companies-for-information-on-human-rights-in-china/</link>
		<comments>http://business-ethics.com/2010/02/03/1334-senator-asks-30-companies-for-information-on-human-rights-in-china/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin2</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CSR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NGOs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation & Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socially Responsible Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Durbin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eBay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fortinet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Network Initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hilary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Juniper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lenovo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McAfee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nokia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nokia Siemens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siemens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sprint Nextel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toshiba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vodafone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Websense]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://business-ethics.com/?p=1292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. Senator Dick Durbin this week sent letters to 30 information and communications technology companies - including Apple, Facebook, Skype and Twitter - seeking information about their human rights practices in China.  Durbin also announced plans to hold a follow-up hearing on global internet freedom next month.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://business-ethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Capitol-Senate_Full.JPG"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1293" title="Capitol-Senate_Full" src="http://business-ethics.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Capitol-Senate_Full-300x215.jpg" alt="Capitol-Senate_Full" width="300" height="235" /></a>U.S. Senator Dick Durbin this week sent letters to 30 information and communications technology companies - including Apple, Facebook, Skype and Twitter - seeking information about their human rights practices in China.  Durbin also announced plans to hold a follow-up hearing on global internet freedom next month.</p>
<p>Durbin’s initiative follows<a title="Google Blog on China" href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/new-approach-to-china.html" target="_blank"> Google’s announcement that it had been the victim of cyber attacks aimed at gaining access to the email accounts of Chinese human rights activists</a>. Google has said it is considering pulling out of China because of the attacks and what the company called “attempts over the past year to further limit free speech on the web.”</p>
<p>Only two weeks ago, U.S. Secretary of State <a title="Hilary Clinton on Internet Censorship" href="http://business-ethics.com/2010/01/21/1525-clinton-urges-companies-to-take-principled-stand-on-internet-censorship/" target="_blank">Hilary Clinton called on American technology companies to make a “principled stand” against attempts at censorship</a>.</p>
<p>Sen. Durbin, Chairman of the Judiciary Subcommittee on Human Rights and the Law, said his hearing next month will feature testimony from Google and other companies about their business practices “in internet-restricting countries,” as well as from high-ranking Obama Administration officials about the Administration’s efforts to promote internet freedom.</p>
<p>“I commend Google for coming to the conclusion that cooperating with the ‘Great Firewall’ of China is inconsistent with their human rights responsibilities,” Durbin said. “Google sets a strong example in standing up to the Chinese government’s continued failure to respect the fundamental human rights of free expression and privacy. I look forward to learning more about whether other American companies are willing to follow Google’s lead.”</p>
<p>Durbin’s letter asks each firm for details of its business in China, and what, if any, measures it will implement to ensure that its products and services do not facilitate human rights abuses by the Chinese government.</p>
<p>This week’s letter also follows up on a letter that Durbin sent last year, urging technology firms to join a voluntary code of conduct known as the Global Network Initiative (GNI). The code of conduct, which regulates the actions of technology firms operating in countries that restrict the internet, has been backed by Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo! and a number of leading socially responsible investment firms.</p>
<p>Durbin’s office said the list of companies that responded to his previous letter included Apple, AT&amp;T, Cisco, Dell, eBay, Facebook, HP, McAfee, News Corp, Nokia, Nokia Siemens, Siemens, Skype, Sprint Nextel, Verizon, Vodafone, Websense.</p>
<p>According to Senator Durbin’s office, companies that did not respond to his previous letter were Acer, Juniper, Toshiba, Twitter; companies that “partially responded” to his previous letter were Fortinet, Lenovo, Motorola.</p>
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Senator+Questions+30+Companies+on+Human+Rights+in+China+http://business-ethics.com/?p=1292" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://business-ethics.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter-big4.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://business-ethics.com/2010/02/03/1334-senator-asks-30-companies-for-information-on-human-rights-in-china/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

